Segmentary processes and structures can be illustrated in the following diagrams.
Segmentary Descent | |
Descent Lines This schematic diagram depicts the generation of the system. A hypothetical ancestor (I), the founder of the entire group, has two sons (A and B), each of whom serves as a focal point for the division of the larger unit into two smaller subgroups. The process is reiterated as A and B have two sons each (1,2,3,4), who in turn have two sons and so on. The descent process sets up a plan for the formation of a series of nested descent groups.
Roll mouse onto image to view unanimated
version. |
![]() |
Segmentation All the the descendents of I are included in a maximal lineage, 4 generations deep, which will most likely bear the founder's name. A and B define two segments which partition the maximal lineage members according to the two divergent descent lines. This process is repeated in successive generations until minimal lineages, usually extended family households, are included.
Roll mouse onto image to view unanimated
version. |
![]() |
Group Membership From an individual participant's perspective the system can be viewed as a series of ever more inclusive groups. Thus i is a member of four groups:
each of which has a different scope and set of functions.
Roll mouse onto image to view unanimated
version. |
![]() |
There are several important examples of segmentary lineage systems in anthropology, including the classic studies of Evans-Pritchard on the Nuer and Paul Bohannon on the Tiv. We shall be analyzing this form of organization in an attempt to reconstruct the social order of the ancient Hebrews. We shall also take a look at a simpler segmentary system among the matrilineal Akan peoples.
© 1995 Brian Schwimmer, All rights reserved